ext_376296 ([identity profile] fingertrouble.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] fingertrouble 2011-03-17 02:10 am (UTC)

It wasn't a 'terrible disaster' - I don't think anyone died for a start. 8-100 millirems. Not great, but minor?

Chernobyl official estimate 4,000 people have died because of it - and that's really conservative, and didn't count most of the countries. Estimates range from 10,000 to 100,000 to a million. But the NFL still likes to downplay this - and yes I have had experience of the nuclear fuel lobby cos I worked at a consultancy that worked for BNFL - i know some of the propaganda tricks they play that make BAT and Philip Morris look like angels - infiltrating protest groups anyone? Certainly the risk has been very downplayed, and that list actually only covers direct deaths...there have been many more, and cos it's a different sort of radiation/exposure it's longer life and harder to judge than say Hiroshima or Nagasaki which were literal flashes in the pan.

Chernobyl - there are still farms here that cannot sell their sheep for meat TODAY - 370 odd of them, cos Caesium is STILL in the soil. You feel a little different when your country was irradiated - and not a few little millirems either.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org