ext_310747 ([identity profile] topher-fox.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] fingertrouble 2011-03-17 01:36 am (UTC)

I'm not saying its okay cause he was in there. I'm just saying, you have someone who walked thru a "terrable disaster" and still supports it.

and ffs. Chernobyl Shouldn't be classified a nuclear disaster. That should be its own category of soviet and training massive cockups.

Again. that wikipedia list.... you have processing facility accidents: untrained staff, experimental reactor issues: experimental means untested. And how many actual end in deaths or leaks. these systems are designs to have fail safes and backups so that when skilled human operators run them, the chance of release is near 0. Nothing is perfect. In the end all forms of energy production pollute, kill, and cock up someones life.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org